Yorkshire racism hearing terrible look – Vaughan

Former England captain Michael Vaughan says the disciplinary hearing into allegations of racism at Yorkshire is a “terrible look” for cricket.

Vaughan has “completely and categorically” denied the allegation – and did so again when giving evidence for the first time in the hearing on Friday.

The 48-year-old was critical of the process and said he met Rafiq in November 2021 because “the whole situation was escalating out of control”.

In the meeting Vaughan apologised to Rafiq for the hurt the former spinner had experienced at Yorkshire but did not accept he made the alleged comment.

Vaughan repeated that denial on Friday, saying: “I can’t apologise for something I don’t recollect saying.”

Rafiq said on Thursday that Vaughan’s actions after their meeting had left him feeling “naive”.

“It’s not been easy for anybody,” said Vaughan, under cross-examination by Jane Mulcahy KC – the lawyer for the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB).

“This is not the right process to deal with word-against-word comments from 14 years ago.

“Ex-team-mates fighting it out over hearsay is a terrible look for the game and a really bad look on how cricket has dealt with this situation.”

Vaughan makes ‘Question of Sport’ joke during hearing

Yorkshire has pleaded guilty to four amended charges from the ECB, which also includes the county accepting they failed to address the “systemic use of racist or discriminatory language” at the club over a prolong period, including Rafiq’s career.

Former Yorkshire and England bowler Matthew Hoggard has admitted using a racist slur relating to Pakistani heritage and another racist term that is offensive in South Africa while at the club.

Vaughan repeatedly denied having heard such racial slurs while at Yorkshire.

When asked to confirm details about how many years he had played alongside Hoggard for both Yorkshire and England, Vaughan joked: “It’s like Question of Sport, this.”

The former batter, who started work as a BBC pundit after retiring in 2009, said he had a “very clear mind” about the match in question against Nottinghamshire at Trent Bridge on 22 June 2009.

He said he “knows” he did not make the alleged comment to Rafiq, Adil Rashid, Ajmal Shahzad and Rana Naved-ul-Hasan because he was “proud” of it being the first time four Asian players had been in the same side for Yorkshire and it was a sign of how far the county had come.

He agreed that the comment was unacceptable and racist but insisted he did not say it, in part because it would have affected the morale of his team-mates and possibly their performance.

“I make sure people are loved,” added Vaughan.

Vaughan also denied he had said the alleged comment in jest.

Mulcahy brought up historical tweets sent by Vaughan, which were brought to his attention in his BBC interview in November 2021, and the ex-England captain apologised again for the “disgusting” messages.

Mulcahy suggested the “tweets are remarkably similar in tone to the allegation”, which Vaughan denied.

Vaughan did agree with Mulcahy that the tweets he has apologised for would be offensive to Rafiq.

He said he took part in an online diversity course while working in Australia covering the 2021-22 Ashes because he “wanted to be a leader in the game”.

ECB defend investigation

Among the witnesses called on Friday was Meena Botros, the ECB’s director of legal and integrity, who was in charge of the governing body’s investigation into the allegations against Yorkshire.

Vaughan’s lawyer, Christopher Stoner KC, criticised the ECB’s handling of the investigation, questioning why it did not speak to everyone present in and around the huddle, when Vaughan allegedly made the “you lot” comment.

Stoner asked why the ECB did not speak to the two umpires, the Sky cameraman and some of the other Yorkshire players in the team that day.

Botros said “no-one has suggested the umpires were close enough to hear it” and Sky footage showed they “weren’t close to the huddle”.

He added there was also “no suggestion” the cameraman heard it, and it was “assumed he would have had headphones on”.

Botros said they “weren’t able” to get contact details for some players and others either did not want to take part or had made their position “very clear”.

He added he was “not aware” of Vaughan’s legal team chasing up these lines of inquiry, saying: “If you think it’s such an important point then that may have been taken up.”